12. Pediatric Trauma

Information dedicated to the care of injured children

Alcohol and Substance Misuse Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral for Treatment (SBIRT) Guidelines for Pediatric Trauma Patients at Nebraska Medicine

Policy and Procedure Statement

The pediatric co-management team will be consulted on all pediatric trauma patients (18 years and younger) admitted to Nebraska Medicine following injury.

As part of their role in the patient’s care, pediatric co-management will assist the trauma team in performing alcohol and substance misuse screening, brief intervention and treatment (SBIRT) as indicated on pediatric trauma patients age 11 years and older.

Screening:

  1. Pediatric trauma patients age 12 years and older will be routinely screened for alcohol and substance use on admission by laboratory screening using blood alcohol level and/or urine drug screen (UDS). Pediatric trauma patients less than 12 years of age will undergo laboratory screening as needed based on history or suspicion of alcohol or substance misuse.
  2. A HEADSS assessment will be performed on all admitted pediatric trauma patients age 11 years and older by the pediatric co-management team once the patient reaches floor status.
  3. If HEADSS assessment is positive for the questions pertaining to drug/alcohol use and exposure AND/OR if blood alcohol (ETOH) or urine drug screen (UDS) testing is positive on admission labs, a CRAFFT screening questionnaire will also be administered.
      • If the patient is unable to be screened due to the medical condition or refuses, this will be documented in the medical record.

Intervention and Referral for Treatment:

  1. A CRAFFT score of 2 or higher indicates a positive screen. Patients with a positive screen will receive a brief intervention conducted and documented by the pediatric co-management provider, social worker or member of child psychiatry team with referrals for outpatient treatment as indicated.
      • All pediatric patients who screen positive will receive a social work consult for information on area alcohol/substance misuse programs and assistance with referrals as indicated. 
      • Child psychiatry may be consulted at the discretion of the trauma or pediatric co-management providers for either inpatient or outpatient assessment of alcohol/substance misuse.

Documentation:

The HEADDS assessment, results of alcohol and urine drug screen and CRAFFT assessment (if performed) will be documented in a pediatric co-management team progress note in the patient’s electronic medical record when consulted. For those patients remaining in the ICU for entire hospital course, alcohol and substance misuse screening and interventions will be performed and documented as indicated by the trauma service.

Performance Improvement:

Per American College of Surgeons (ACS) Standards, a minimum of 80% of trauma patients with a hospital stay of >24 hours must be screened for alcohol misuse and a minimum of 80% of patients screening positive must receive an intervention.

Documentation of SBIRT will be done in the trauma registry database.

Any patients that had missed screenings or interventions will be reviewed in the trauma performance improvement process.

References:

  1. Cohen E, MacKenzie RG, Yates GL. HEADSS, psychosocial risk assessment instrument: Implications for designing effective intervention programs for runaway youth. J Adolesc Health (1991); 12(7):539-544.
  2. Katzenellenbogen R, HEADSS: The “Review of systems” for adolescents. Virtual Mentor (2005) Mar 1; 7(3): virtualmentor.2005.7.3.cprl1-0503.
  3. Knight JR, Sherritt L, Shrier LA, Harris SK, Chang G. Validity of CRAFFT substance abuse screening test among adolescent clinic patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. (2002) Jun;156(6):607-614.
  4. American College of Surgeons, Resources for the Optimal Care of the Injured Patient, 2022 Standards.





Behavioral Consultation Team Contact Information

Child Life in Trauma Resuscitations

Child Life ED Presentation.pdf

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

image.png

 

Discharging a Pediatric Trauma Patient Against Medical Advice (AMA)

PURPOSE:

To establish guidelines for addressing situations when minor/pediatric trauma patients depart prior to dismissal by provider (discharge against medical advice) and recognize the right of the patient’s legally recognized representative to make that determination, unless otherwise limited by law.

When any patient leaves prior to dismissal or elopes, it is the policy of Nebraska Medicine to act in accordance with the welfare of the patient and the public while respecting the patient’s rights and complying with applicable laws.

These guidelines are created specifically for the pediatric trauma patient and may not be applicable to adult trauma patients or other service lines. For more information regarding Nebraska Medicine hospital policy, please refer to LD21—Patient Departure Prior to Dismissal (AMA).

DEFINITIONS:

POLICY

  1. The legally recognized representative (i.e. parent, legal guardian) of a minor patient has the right to terminate the care encounter and remove the patient from the premise at any time, except when prohibited by law.
      • Patients who are under a legal hold may not have the right to leave the premises at a time of their choose (see policy LD 12-Legal Status Holds).
      • Questions about restrictions related to specific legal holds should be referred to Legal or Risk Management.
  2. If staff believe that the minor patient may be at risk for serious or imminent harm (i.e medical neglect) if removed from the care environment, it may be appropriate to consider reporting the concern an appropriate authority, such as Child Protective Services or law enforcement.
      • If there are questions or further discussion regarding the specific situation is warranted, providers are encouraged to call Risk Management at 402-559-0060 (24/7 hotline).
  3. Nebraska Medicine will make reasonable efforts to ensure that the minor patient and the legally recognized representative for the minor is informed of the risks of leaving against the advice of the provider.
  4. Nebraska Medicine respects the minor patient’s/legally recognized representative’s right to choose to accept or decline care. A patient’s or representative’s decision to leave against medical advice of the provider will not negative influence the patient’s ability to receive future care with Nebraska Medicine.

PROCEDURE


KEY CONTRIBUTORS



Evaluation and Management of Blunt Solid Organ Injuries in Pediatric Trauma Patients

Purpose:

These guidelines are meant to help guide the provider through the initial evaluation and management of pediatric trauma patients sustaining blunt solid organ injuries to the liver, spleen, or kidney at Nebraska Medicine.

Background/definitions:

Solid organ injuries may occur to the liver, spleen or kidney. Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in the setting of blunt trauma is preferred when possible and is considered the standard of care in hemodynamically stable pediatric patients, irrespective of the grade of injury. Literature reveals that non-operative management of pediatric blunt solid organ injuries is associated with a low overall morbidity and mortality and does not result in increased length of stay, need for blood transfusions, bleeding complications or associated hollow viscous injuries as compared with operative management.    

Guideline Inclusion Criteria:

Guideline Exclusion Criteria:

Diagnostic Evaluation:

 

Practice Recommendations for Management:

Follow-up Care:

Outcome Measures and Guideline Adherence: 

Key Contributors:

Last updated:

·         August, 2024

References:

  1. Williams RF, Grewal H, Jamshidi R et al. Updated APSA guidelines for the management of blunt liver and spleen injuries. J Pediatr Surg. 2023; 58:1411-1418.
  2. Gates RL, Price M, Cameron DB, et al. Non-operative management of solid organ injuries in children: an American pediatric surgical association outcomes and evidence based practice committee systemic review. J Pediatr Surg.2019 Aug: 54(8):1519-1526.
  3. Linnaus MR, Langlais ME, Garcia NM, et al. Failure of nonoperative management of pediatric blunt liver and spleen injuries: A prospective Arizona-Texas-Oklahoma-Memphis-Arkansas Consortium Study. J Trauma and Acute Care. 2017; 82(4):672-679.

Appendix/supplemental materials:

  1.      Updated American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) Blunt Liver/Spleen Injury Guidelines

embedded-image-ZLw6W91c.png

 

2.      AAST Injury Grading Scales

 

 

Evaluation and Management of Non-Accidental Trauma (NAT) in Children at Nebraska Medicine

Purpose:

To provide guidance and a standardized approach for the initial evaluation, management and reporting of children with injuries concerning for abuse.

Background/Definitions:

Annually, nearly 1 million children are victims of child maltreatment in the United States. It is estimated that 1:4 children will experience some form of child abuse or neglect in their lifetime (1:7 in the past year) accounting for a total lifetime economic cost upward of $124 billion.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) defines child maltreatment as “any act or series of acts of commission or omission by a parent or other caregiver that results in harm, potential for harm, or threat of harm to a child.”

The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) establishes that standard legal definition of  child abuse and neglect as “any recent act or failure to act on the part of the parent or caretaker which results in death, serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation; or an act or failure to act, which presents an imminent risk of serious harm.”

In 2019, there were approximately 656,000 victims of child abuse and/or neglect in the United States as confirmed by state child protective service agencies.

Nationally, there were an estimated 1,840 children who died from abuse and neglect in 2019.

Sentinel injuries are injuries suspicious for physical abuse with rates of abuse high enough to warrant routine evaluation of abuse if the injury is present. Sentinel injuries can seem minor, and high level of suspicion and familiarity with high-risk injuries is critical for identification.

For the purposes of this guidelines, a non-ambulatory child is a child who cannot take two independent steps without the assistance of a person or inanimate object for support. Cruising is not considered ambulatory.

Guideline Inclusion Criteria:

·         Children from newborn through adolescence (18 years and younger) with an injury concerning for physical abuse.

Guideline Exclusion Criteria:

·         Injured patients age >18 years.

·         Children involved in a motor-vehicle collision, regardless of age or ambulatory status, are excluded from this guideline.

Diagnostic Evaluation:

While any injury can be the result of physical abuse, there are NO injuries that are pathognomonic. The following are reasons to be concerned that injuries could be related to physical abuse (this list is not exhaustive):

History:

Physical Exam:

Practice Recommendations for Management:

Injured children presenting to Nebraska Medicine should be initially evaluated and managed in accordance with ATLS guidelines. Clinicians should first ensure the child is medically stable. If during the assessment concerns for physical abuse/non-accidental trauma are raised, the following additional work-up should ensue as early as practical based on the severity of injuries and clinical status of the child.

Initial Management:

Children 0 to 24 months meeting at least one of the following criteria:

  1. Less than 24 months with an injury concerning for abuse
  2. Non-ambulatory with a skeletal fracture
  3. Less than 12 months with a skeletal fracture

Children >24 months with an injury concerning for abuse will receive the following:

Additional Laboratory and Diagnostic Evaluation

Additional labs, imaging and testing may be obtained as indicated specific to the injury or individual circumstances. If there are questions regarding what additional testing is needed, please discuss with the CAT.

Consultation

Admission/Disposition

***Please see algorithm from Pediatric Trauma Society and Western Trauma Association below as an additional guide to what is stated above***

Reminders:

Important phone numbers:

Follow-up Care:

Outcome Measures and Guideline Adherence: 

Key Contributors:

Last updated:

·         June 2024

References:

  1. Prevention CDCa. Child Maltreatment: Fact-Sheet. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention; 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/cmfacts.htm.
  2. Prevention CDCa. Child Abuse and Neglect Prevention. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Division of Violence Prevention; 2017. http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/childmaltreatment/.
  3. Finkelhor D, Turner HA, Shattuck A, Hamby SL. Violence, crime, and abuse exposure in a national sample of children and youth: an update. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(7):614-21.
  4. Leeb RT, Paulozzi L, Melanson C, et al. Chile Maltreatment Surveillance: Uniform Definitions for Public Health and Recommended Data Elements, Version 1.0. In: Center for Disease Control and Prevention NCflPaC, editor. Atlanta, GA. 2008.
  5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ACYF, Administration on Children, Youth and Families, Children’s Bureau. Child Maltreatment 2016. Washington, D.C.: Children’s Bureau (Administration for Children, Youth, and Families, Administration for Children and Families) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018.
  6. Berger RP, Lindberg DM. Early recognition of physical abuse: Bridging the gap between knowledge and practice. J Pediatr. 2018; 204:16-23.
  7. Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Aldridge S, O’Flynn J, Lorenz DJ. Bruising characteristics discriminated physical child abuse from accidental trauma. Pediatrics, 2010: 125(1); 67-74.
  8. Pierce MC, Kaczor K, Lorenz DJ, Bertocci G, Fingarson AK, Makoroff K, Berger RP. Validation of a clinical decision rule to predict abuse in young children based on bruising characteristics. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(4):e215832.
  9. Kleinman PK, ed. Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  10. ACS Trauma Quality Programs Best Practice Guidelines for Trauma Center Recognition of Child Abuse, Elder Abuse, and Intimate Partner Violence. abuse_guidelines.pdf (facs.org) November, 2019.
  11. Burg B, Dougherty M, Snyder K, Shanghvi D, Naiditch J, et al. Dell Children’s Medical Center, Evidence-based Outcome Center, “Evaluation for Occult Injury Guideline”. February, 2022.
  12. Rosen NG, Escobar MA, Brown CV, et al. Child physical abuse trauma evaluation and management: A Western Trauma Association and Pediatric Trauma Society critical decisions algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.2021; 90(4): 641-651.

 

Western Trauma Association and Pediatric Trauma Society complete algorithm for the evaluation and management of children with Child Physical Abuse (CPA) trauma.

Guidelines for Imaging the Pediatric Trauma Patient

Purpose:

These guidelines are meant to help guide the provider’s decision-making regarding imaging of the pediatric trauma patient during the initial trauma evaluation.

Background/Definitions:

There is considerable agreement that diagnostic imaging, particularly with computed tomography (CT), results in significant radiation exposure in children.  In addition, while the precise implications of this radiation exposure have not been defined, there is consensus that it is associated with a low, but real, increase in the long-term development of fatal malignancy.  Children are particularly sensitive to the effects of radiation given their small size (increase dose per unit area) and the long latent times between exposure and the resultant cancer.  Exposure to diagnostic radiation in children has increased dramatically in recent years with increasing use of CT.  The primary indication for these scans is for the evaluation of trauma and appendicitis.  Both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Pediatric Surgical Association have recently published statements encouraging their members to adhere to the ALARA principle, “As Low as Reasonably Achievable,” when obtaining imaging in pediatric patients (1, 2).

While the use of CT to diagnosis injuries in children has been increasing, there is a growing body of literature to suggest that CT is not required for routine evaluation resulting in the creation of several prediction rules to help guide the physician on what type and when imaging might be indicated to adequately assess the pediatric trauma patient.

In light of this evidence, we recommend adherence to the ALARA principle when imaging pediatric trauma patients.  Specifically, we recommend:

  1. Avoidance of the use of protocols which automatically result in the performance of multiple CT scans (i.e. head, cervical spine, chest, and abdomen and pelvis) in pediatric patients.
  2. Avoid further CT imaging once the decision to transfer to definitive care is made, unless the accepting institution specifically requests a scan prior to transfer.
  3. All CT scans on children should be performed using “pediatric” weight-based dose-reduction protocols per Nebraska Medicine radiology procedures.
  4. Accepting institution should avoid repeating scans unnecessarily and when possible utilize alternative imaging strategies.

Guideline Inclusion Criteria:

Guideline Exclusion Criteria:

Practice Recommendations for Management:

Initial Assessment:

Additional Imaging:

Outcome Measures and Guideline Adherence: 

Key Contributors:

Last updated:

·         February, 2026

References:

  1. Brody, Frush, Huda, Brent, and the Section of Radiology, “Radiation Risk to Children from Computed Tomography,” Pediatrics 120: 677-682, 2007.
  2. Rice, Frush, Farmer, Waldhausen, and the APSA Education Committee, “Review of radiation risks from computed tomography: essential for the pediatric surgeon. J Pediatr Surg 42: 603-7, 2007.
  3. Kupperman N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, et al. Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009; 374(9696): 1160-70.
  4. Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Velmahos GC, Nance ML, et al Clinical clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients younger than 3 years:  A multi-center study of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma 2009; 67(3):543-550.
  5. Markel, Kumar, Koontz, et al. The utility of computed tomography as a screening tool for the evaluation of pediatric blunt chest trauma. J Trauma 67:23-28, 2009.
  6. Singh, Kalra, Moore, et al. Dose reduction and compliance with pediatric CT protocols adapted to patient size, clinical indication, and number of prior studies. Radiology 252: 200-208, 2009.
  7. Chwals, Robinson, Sivit, et al. Computed tomography before transfer to a level I pediatric trauma center risks duplication with associated increased radiation exposure. J Pediatr Surg 43 2268-2272, 2008.
  8. ACS Trauma Quality Programs Best Practice Guidelines in Imaging. imaging_guidelines.pdf (facs.org) October, 2018.
  9. Holmes JF, Yen K, Ugaldge IT, et al. PECARN prediction rules for CT imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt abdominal or minor head trauma: a multicentre prospective validation study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 May; 8(5):339-347.
  10. Leonard JC, Harding M, Cook LJ, et a.l PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2024 Jul; 8(7):482-490.
  11. Chung S, Mikrogianakis A, Wales PW, et al. Trauma Association of Canada Pediatric Subcommittee National Pediatric Cervical Spine Evaluation Pathway: Consensus guidelines. J Trauma. 2011; 70(4):873-884.
  12. Nigrovic LE, Rogers AJ, Adelgais KM, et al. Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) Cervical Spine Study Group. Utility of plain radiographs in detecting traumatic injuries of the cervical spine in children. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012; 28(5):426-432.
  13. Herbert JP, Venkataraman SS, Turkmani AH, Zhu L, et al. Pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury: The McGovern screening score. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018; 21(6):639-649.
  14. Venkataraman SS, Herbert JP, Ravindra VM, et al. Multi-center validation of the McGovern Pediatric Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury Screening Score. J Neurotrauma. 2023; 40(13-14):1451-1458.
  15. Emergency Medical Services for Children Innovation and Improvement Center (EIIC) (2025). EIIC: Best Practices in Pediatric Trauma Imaging.  https://emscimprovement.center/education-and-resources/peak/multisystem-trauma/imaging/

Indications to Consult Pediatric Critical Care

Purpose

The trauma service frequently encounters critically injured pediatric patients (aged 18 years or less) that require admission to the pediatric ICU for resuscitation and management of injuries. To optimize outcomes, assistance in resuscitation and care of these critically injured pediatric trauma patients is often enhanced by the involvement of pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM). As a result, collaboration between the trauma and pediatric critical care services is essential and the following guidelines are meant to outline when pediatric critical care should be consulted to assist in the management and care of injured children requiring admission to the pediatric ICU.

Indications to Consult Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM)

  1. All injured children requiring ICU or progressive care level admission, age 12 years and younger.
  2. Injured children with pre-existing or congenital conditions that would benefit from the expertise of a pediatric intensivist, age 18 and under.
  3. At the admitting trauma attending’s discretion.

Consulting Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM)

  1. The trauma service will contact the PCCM provider listed “on call” on PerfectServe for consultation/handoff if the patient is being admitted/transferred to the PICU.
  2. The trauma service will need to place an “Inpatient consult to pediatric critical care” consult order. Reason for consultation can be “medical co-management.”
      • Use the PEDATRIC TRAUMA ADMISSION – 12 years old and younger order set. Select “Inpatient consult to Pediatric Critical Care Medicine” order under Physician Consults-Academic section followed by also selecting the associated order “Notify physician/provider—Please contact Pediatric Critical Care Medicine regarding invasive/non-invasive respiratory support, sedation, CRRT settings, and adjustment of existing pressors. For ALL OTHER CONCERNS, contact the TRAUMA TEAM” located in the Vital Signs/Notify Physician section.   
  3. Direct verbal communication should occur between the trauma and PCCM providers caring for the patient on admission/transfer to the pediatric ICU and with any change in patient status/condition.  

General Requirements

  1. When consulted, PCCM will assist with management until the patient is transferred out “critical care” status. At which time, a pediatric co-management consult should be considered.
  2. The trauma service will serve as the patient’s PRIMARY team. As a result, the trauma surgeon/team must be kept informed of and concur with all major therapeutic and management decisions when care is being provided by the PCCM team. 
        • A minimum of daily communication between the trauma and PCCM teams should occur to discuss patient care plans.
        • The trauma and PCCM teams will round daily on patients and write daily progress notes.
        • If it is determined that the trauma team should no longer be the primary team on a patient (i.e. transferring to another pediatric service), the trauma service will be responsible for finding an accepting primary service, placing the necessary orders for transfer, communicating plans for transfer with PCCM team, and documentation of transfer to include patient’s current status/injury management/follow-up/transfer details/etc. (“sign off” note)
  3. If PCCM is consulted, adult critical care surgery (CCS) services will not be involved in the care of the pediatric trauma patient unless specifically requested by the trauma service.

Responsibilities of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) Team

  1. Management of vasopressors and other continuous infusions (i.e. sedation, analgesia, etc.).
  2. Management of ventilator.
  3. Placement and management of central venous catheters, PICC line, and arterial lines (in collaboration with trauma team).
  4. Medication management, review, and reconciliation.
      • Including guidance for dosing by weight and age (in collaboration with pediatric pharmacy).
      • including electrolyte replacement, glucose management, seizure management, and antibiotics (in collaboration with the trauma team). 
  5. Ensuring adjunctive modalities are used for delirium prevention, pain control, and refusal of PO/medications by child or parent.
  6. Discrepancies between orders (in collaboration with the trauma team).
  7. Management of pre-existing/chronic medical conditions.
  8. Responding to all acute decline and decompensation events.
      • In addition, will contact the trauma team to provide updates on significant events or status changes.
  9. Screening and interventions for non-accidental trauma, as deemed necessary (in collaboration with the trauma team).
  10. Counseling and guidance of injury prevention, including causative injury and other preventative measures, to patient and family.
  11. Communication with primary pediatrician/PCP.
  12. Facilitate pediatric specialist consults and follow-up (in collaboration with the trauma team).
  13. Assist the trauma team with facilitating discharge to inpatient rehabilitation.

Responsibilities of the Trauma Service

  1. Contacting all consult services based on patient injuries and clinical findings.
  2. Coordinating and managing all procedural and operative interventions.
  3. Admission and discharge orders and notes.
  4. Diet/nutrition management and associated orders.
  5. Activity orders.
  6. Wound care management and associated orders.
  7. Imaging and lab orders.
  8. Determination of need, orders, and management of DVT prophylaxis (in collaboration with PCCM and pharmacy).
  9. Blood product transfusions (in collaboration with PCCM). 
  10. Management of new medical issues (in collaboration with PCCM).
  11. Chest tube placement and management (in collaboration with PCCM).

References

  1. Rosen, N. G., Escobar Jr, M. A., Brown, C. V., Moore, E. E., Sava, J. A., Peck, K., ... & Martin, M. J. (2021). Child physical abuse trauma evaluation and management: a Western Trauma Association and Pediatric Trauma Society critical decisions algorithm. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 90(4), 641-651.
  2. American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2019). ACS Trauma Quality Program Best Practices Guidelines for Trauma Center Recognition of Child Abuse, Elder Abuse, and Intimate Parner Violence. Release November 2019. Available at https://www.facs.org/media/o0wdimys/abuse_guidelines.pdf. Accessed March 20, 2024.

Authors

  1. Emily Cantrell, MD | Division of Acute Care Surgery, Faculty | Principal Author
  2. Megan Samland, DNP | Division of Acute Care Surgery, Advanced Practice Provider | Principal Author
  3. Eleanor Gradidge, MD | Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Faculty | Principal Author

Last Updated: June, 2024



Indications to Consult Pediatric Co-Management Team for Pediatric Trauma Patients

Purpose:

The trauma service frequently admits and cares for injured children (aged 18 years or less). To optimize outcomes and inpatient care, assistance in the management and care of these injured pediatric trauma patients is enhanced by involvement of the pediatric co-management team. As a result, collaboration between the trauma and pediatric co-management team is essential. These guidelines outline when pediatric co-management team should be consulted to assist in the management and care of pediatric trauma patients.

Indications to Consult Pediatric Co-Management

  1. injured children age 18 and under upon admission or transfer to a pediatric floor 

Consulting Pediatric Co-Management

  1. The trauma service will contact the Pediatric Co-Management provider listed “on call” on PerfectServe under “General Pediatric and Neonatology Academic Service TNMC” (choose general pediatric inpatient) for consultation/handoff if the patient is being admitted/transferred to the pediatric floor.
  2. The trauma service will need to place an “Inpatient consult to pediatrics academic” consult order in EPIC. Reason for consultation can be “medical co-management.”
  3. Direct verbal communication should occur between the trauma and pediatric co-management providers caring for the patient on admission/transfer to the pediatric floor and with any change in patient status/condition.  The pediatric resident may be reached at 402-619-9157.

General requirements:

  1. When consulted, Pediatric Co-Management will assist with management of pediatric trauma patients once they are considered floor status.
  2. The trauma service will serve as the patient’s PRIMARY team. As a result, the trauma surgeon/team must be kept informed of and concur with all major therapeutic and management recommendations by the pediatric co-management team. 
        •  A minimum of daily communication between the trauma and pediatric co-management teams should occur to discuss patient care plans.
              • The pediatric co-management provider will contact the trauma team daily and as needed via PerfectServe (“Trauma Academic Service) with recommendations after seeing the patient.
        • The trauma team will round daily on patients and write daily progress notes. Following the initial consultation and screenings, the pediatric co-management team will evaluate pediatric patients daily and write progress notes as needed to reflect any updates or changes in recommendations. 
        • If it is determined that the trauma team should no longer be the primary team on a patient (i.e. transferring to another pediatric service), the trauma service will be responsible for finding an accepting primary service, placing the necessary orders for transfer, communicating plans for transfer with the pediatric co-management team, and documentation of transfer to include patient’s current status/injury management/follow-up/transfer details/etc. (“sign off” note)

Responsibilities of pediatric co-management team 

  1. Medication management, review, and reconciliation.
      • Including guidance for dosing by weight and age (in collaboration with pediatric pharmacy).
  2. management of pre-existing/chronic medical conditions
  3. Responding to all acute decline and decompensation events.
      • In addition, will contact the trauma team to provide updates on significant events or status changes.
  4. discrepancies between orders (in collaboration with the trauma team)
  5. communication with primary pediatrician/PCP 
  6. substance and alcohol misuse screening with interventions as needed  
  7. screening and interventions as determined necessary for non-accidental trauma (in conjunction with the trauma team) 
  8. Counseling and guidance of injury prevention, including causative injury and other preventative measures, to patient and family.
  9. Facilitate pediatric specialist consults and follow-up (in collaboration with the trauma team).
  10. Assist the trauma team with facilitating discharge to inpatient rehabilitation.
  11. Mental health screening

Responsibilities of Trauma Service

  1. Contacting all consult services based on patient injuries and clinical findings.
  2. Coordinating and managing procedural/operative interventions
  3. Admission and discharge orders and notes
  4. Diet/nutrition management and associated orders
  5. Blood product transfusions
  6. Electrolyte replacement, glucose management, bowel regimen orders and other routine daily cares (in collaboration with pediatric co-management and pharmacy)
  7. Activity orders
  8. Pain Management (in collaboration with pediatric co-management)
  9. Wound care management and associated orders.
  10. Imaging and lab orders
  11. Determination of need, orders, and management of DVT prophylaxis (in collaboration with Pediatric co-management and pharmacy)
  12. Management of new medical issues (in collaboration with Pediatric co-management)
  13. Line and tube placement and management (central lines, chest tubes, etc.)

Authors:

Last Revised

July, 2024

Managment of Open Pediatric Orthopedic Fractures

Purpose:

To provide guidance on the management of open orthopedic fractures in pediatric trauma patients.

Background/definitions:

An open fracture is a fracture in which there is an open wound or break in the skin near the site of the broken bone. Most often, this wound is caused by a fragment of bone breaking through the skin at the time of injury. The fractured bone is exposed to contamination from the external environment and is susceptible to infection.

Guideline Inclusion Criteria:

Guideline Exclusion Criteria:

Practice Recommendations for Management:

  1. Orthopedic surgery should be consulted on all open pediatric orthopedic fractures.
  2. Classification is made according to the Gustillo classification of open fractures. This classification is made at the time of operative debridement.
      • Type I: open fracture with wound <1cm long; clean
      • Type II: open fracture with wound >1cm long; soft tissue damage, avulsions, tissue flap, minimal to moderate contamination
      • Type III: extensive soft tissue damage, open segmental fracture; significant contamination.
          • Type IIIA: soft tissue coverage is adequate (primary closure/delayed primary closure or skin graft)
          • Type IIIB: periosteal stripping, bone exposure, massive contamination; will require either rotational flap or free flap for coverage
          • Type IIIC: open fracture with arterial injury requiring repair to salvage limb
  3. Antibiotics should be initiated within 60 minutes of patient arrival:
      • Type I and II:
          •  Preferred: Cefazolin 30 mg/kg IV now and q8hr x 3 total doses (not to exceed 2000mg/dose)
          •  Severe cephalosporin allergy: Clindamycin 10mg/kg IV now and q8hr x 3 doses (not to exceed 900 mg/dose)
          • Known MRSA colonization: add vancomycin 15mg/kg IV q12hr
          •  Duration of prophylaxis: 24 hours
      • Type III
          • No gross contamination:
              • Preferred: Cefazolin 30 mg/kg IV now and q8hr x 3 total doses (not to exceed 2000mg/dose)
              • Severe cephalosporin allergy: Clindamycin 10mg/kg IV now and q8hr x 3 doses (not to exceed 900 mg/dose)
              • Known MRSA colonization: add vancomycin 15mg/kg IV q12hr
              • Duration of prophylaxis: 48 hours or 24 hours after wound closure, whichever is shorter
          • Contamination with soil or fecal material
              • Preferred: ceftriaxone 75mg/kg IV now and q24hr  (not to exceed 2000mg/dose) AND metronidazole 15mg/kg IV now and q8hr (not to exceed 500 mg/dose)
              • Severe cephalosporin allergy: Clindamycin 10mg/kg IV now and q8hr (not to exceed 900 mg/dose)
              • Known MRSA colonization: add vancomycin 15mg/kg IV q12hr
              • Duration of prophylaxis: 48 hours after wound closure
              • Consider orthopedic infectious disease consult
          • Contamination with standing water:
              • a.      Preferred: Piperacillin/tazobactam 100mg/kg IV q8hr over 4 hours (not to exceed 4.5g IV)
              • b.      Penicillin allergy: Clindamycin 10mg/kg IV now and q8hr (not to exceed 900 mg/dose)  AND metronidazole 15mg/kg IV now and q8hr (not to exceed 500 mg/dose)
              • c.      Known MRSA colonization: add vancomycin 15mg/kg IV q12hr
              • d.      Duration of prophylaxis: 48 hours after wound closure
              • e.      Consider orthopedic infectious disease consult
        • Variances in dosing within 5mg/kg are acceptable based upon dosage rounding in Pharmacy.
        • If there are any drug-related questions (drug choice, dosing, allergies, alternative options), discuss with pharmacy.
  4. Tetanus toxoid should be administered if the patient had an incomplete immunization, if it has been >1- years since the last booster, or if immunization history is unknown or unclear. Tetanus immunoglobulin should be administered if patient has never been immunized and present with wound that is felt to be tetanus prone.
  5. Patients with open fractures should be taken to the operating room for irrigation and debridement within 24 hours of initial presentation whenever possible. Patients with severe fractures associated with gross wound contamination should be brought to the operating room as soon as clinically feasible based on the patient’s condition and resources available. All patients will receive an initial bedside irrigation with removal of obvious foreign contamination and application of clean dressings to wounds in the emergency department.
  6. Whenever possible, skin defects overlying open fractures should be closed at the time of in initial debridement in the operating room.
  7. Soft tissue coverage should be completed within seven days of injury whenever possible for open fractures associated with wounds requiring skin grafting or soft tissue transfers.
  8. Skeletally mature patients between 14 and 18 years of age may follow the adult open fracture protocol (PRO 12 Management of Open Fractures).

Outcome Measures and Guideline Adherence: 

Key Contributors:

Last updated:

·         July, 2024

References:

  1. Davis M, Della Rocca G, Brenner M, et al. (2022) ACS TQIP Best Practices in the Management of Orthopedic Trauma. Best Practices in the Management of Orthopedic Trauma | ACS TQIP (facs.org)

Management of Pediatric Long Bone Fractures

Purpose:

To provide guidance on the management of long bone fractures in pediatric trauma patients.

Background/definitions:

A long bone is defined as any bone of the extremity that has a length greater than the width to include:

Management of pediatric long-bone injuries is highly dependent upon skeletal maturity. In general, the pediatric orthopedic surgery attendings manage long bone injuries in patients with immature skeletons (i.e. open growth plates), while adult orthopedic surgery attendings manage injuries in patients with mature skeletons (i.e. closed growth plates). The general cutoff is 16 years of age, although the final decision for management of an individual patient is at the discretion of the orthopedic surgery attending on-call, and can involve a discussion between the on-call attending surgeons for pediatric and adult orthopedic surgery. Discretion of casting versus operative care of these injuries is at the discretion of the orthopedic attending on call.

Guideline Inclusion Criteria:

Guideline Exclusion Criteria:

Practice Recommendations for Management:

  1. Long bone fractures should be stabilized as early as possible.
  2. Orthopedic surgery will be consulted on all pediatric long bone fractures.
  3. In the absence of polytrauma, definitive long bone stabilization of femoral shaft fractures should occur within 24 hours of arrival.
      • Other long bone fractures should undergo early fixation as deemed appropriate by the orthopedic team.
  4. For the polytrauma patient, medical stability and concomitant injuries should be assessed prior to internal fixation. A damage control approach should be taken and the internal fixation of long bone fractures should be delayed until the patient is adequately resuscitated.
      • Internal fixation should occur within 48 hours of arrival in the polytrauma patient and after initial stabilization.
      • External fixation devices should be utilized until internal fixation is appropriate.
  5. Children younger than thirty-six months with a diaphyseal femur fracture should be evaluated for child abuse.
      • For children younger than one year of age, the Child Advocacy Team (CAT) should be consulted for evaluation.
      • For children above one year of age, consultation of the Child Advocacy Team (CAT) will be at the discretion of the pediatric orthopedic and trauma surgery attendings on call.
  6. Management of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures will be at the discretion of the pediatric orthopedic attending on call, with reference to the 2020 AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline (pdffcpg.pdf (aaos.org)) on this injury.
  7. Transfer of pediatric long bone fractures to Children’s Nebraska for definitive management may be considered in the absence of polytrauma and requires approval from the trauma surgery attending on call.

Outcome Measures and Guideline Adherence: 

  1. Orthopedic response times for urgent consults as well as time to OR for definitive management of long bone fractures will be monitored through the pediatric trauma performance improvement process.
  2. All transfers to Children’s Nebraska will be reviewed through the pediatric trauma performance improvement process.

Key Contributors:

Last updated:

·         July, 2024

References:

  1. Davis M, Della Rocca G, Brenner M, et al. (2022) ACS TQIP Best Practices in the Management of Orthopedic Trauma. Best Practices in the Management of Orthopedic Trauma | ACS TQIP (facs.org)
  2. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. (2022). Treatment of Pediatric Diaphyseal Femur Fractures. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/pdff/pdffcpg.pdf  

Management of Pediatric Pelvic Fractures

Purpose:

Provide guidance on the initial evaluation and management of pediatric trauma patients with pelvic fractures.

Background:

Injures to the pelvis range from benign to life threatening. They include pelvic ring fractures, acetabular fractures, avulsion, and iliac wing fractures. The pelvis in children consists of high cartilaginous volume with greater elasticity at the sacroiliac joints and symphysis. Therefore, the pediatric pelvis is less prone to fracture and more able to dissipate a relatively large amount of energy. Most pediatric pelvic injuries are due to high-energy blunt trauma, which increases the likelihood of concomitant injuries to the head, chest, abdomen, and extremities.

Guideline Inclusion Criteria:

Guideline Exclusion Criteria:

Practice Management Guidelines:

  1. Orthopedic surgery will evaluate the patient within 30 minutes of consultation request; interventional radiology (IR) should be notified if there is any consideration for embolization.
  2. Initial evaluation
      • Patient should be assessed and managed per ATLS guidelines. Physical examination should be performed by the trauma team in conjunction with the orthopedic team to specifically include:
          •  Urologic/vaginal exam
          • Perineum exam
          • Rectal exam
      • An AP pelvis x-ray will be obtained in the trauma bay. The decision to forego AP pelvis x-ray and proceed directly to CT imaging is at the discretion of the trauma surgery attending.
      • Pediatric trauma patients that require pelvic stabilization via binder or sheet are limited to: unstable pelvic fracture and hemodynamically unstable patient
          • This includes patients who arrived hemodynamically unstable and have since stabilized.
          • The pelvic binder or sheet should be placed at the level of the greater trochanters
          • Patients who arrive to the trauma bay with a pelvic binder or stabilization sheet already in place should not have it removed until either AP pelvis x-ray is obtained to determine necessity, or unless directed by Orthopedic Surgery.
              • It is acceptable to briefly remove the binder or stabilization sheet for adequate patient assessment.
      • CT scan of the pelvis, including reconstructions, are obtained to evaluate for associated injuries.
      • Initial evaluation should include determination if a urinary catheter is necessary.
          • The Orthopedic Surgery team will include any recommendations for urinary catheterization in the consult note, and either Orthopedic Surgery or Trauma Surgery will place the order for urinary catheter in the electronic medical record.
          •  Timely urinary catheter insertion is essential. Any barriers to insertion should be promptly escalated to Orthopedic Surgery or Trauma Surgery.
          • Questions related to permissible patient positioning during urinary catheter insertion should be directed to Orthopedic Surgery. If there are difficulties in obtaining proper positioning or if there is concern related to fractures as it relates to positioning, Orthopedic Surgery may be contacted for bedside assistance.
          • Consider urology consult if there are concerns related to urethral injury or if urinary catheterization attempts are unsuccessful.
          • External catheters, such as Pure Wick, are not an acceptable substitution and should not be utilized in acute pelvic fracture management.
          • Mobile patients without activity restrictions may utilize a bedpan.
  3. Management is based upon hemodynamic stability
      • Ultimate decision for fracture treatment is determined by the Orthopedic Surgeon
      • Volume resuscitation with appropriate blood products and maintenance of core temperature must be continued during all phases of resuscitation. Activation of Massive Transfusion Protocol (MTP) will be utilized as indicated per policy (PRO 09- Massive Transfusion in Trauma Guidelines). Blood products will be administered via rapid transfuser.
      • For patients in a pelvic binder:
          • Repeat AP pelvic x-ray should be obtained to assess reduction
          •  Binder should not remain in placed for longer than 48 hours unless there are extenuating circumstances that prevent operative intervention.
          • Skin checks should be performed by the orthopedic surgery service ever 12 hours while the binder is in place, with removal of the binder ever 24 hours for more thorough skin check (maintaining precautions to prevent movement of the pelvis).
          • Skeletal traction may be placed at the discretion of the orthopedic surgery attending.
      • For hemodynamically unstable patients despite adequate resuscitation and/or patients with evidence of contrast extravasation on CT imaging related to pelvic fractures, consider consultation of IR for possible angioembolization.

Pediatric Pelvic Fracture Pathway

 

Key Contributors:

Last updated:

·         July, 2024

References:

  1. Coccolini, F. (2017) Pelvic Trauma: WSES classification and guidelines, World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 12(5), 1-18.
  2. DeFrancesco CJ, Sankar, WN. (2017). Traumatic pelvic fractures in children and adolescents. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery, 26(1), 27-35.
  3. Hermans E, Cornelisse ST, Biert J, et al. (2017) Paediatric pelvic fractures, how do they differ from adults? Journal of Children’s Orthopeadics, 11, 49-56.
  4. Swaid F, Peleg K, Alfici R, et al. (2017). A comparison study of pelvic fractures and associated abdominal injuries between pediatric and adult trauma patients. Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 52, 386-389.
  5. Swenson SJ, Otsuka NY. (2022) Pelvic Fractures. Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America. Pelvic Fractures | Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA).
  6. Tosounidis TH, Sheikh H, Giannoudis PV. (2015). Pelvic fractures in paediatric polytrauma patients: Classification, concomitant injuries and early mortality. The Open Orthopedics Journal. 9(1), 303-312.  

Mental Health Screening and Intervention Guidelines for Pediatric Trauma Patients at Nebraska Medicine

Childhood traumatic stress happens when unexpected, violent, life-threatening, or devastating events overwhelm the ability to cope. The ACS reports that 20-30% of pediatric trauma patients report mental health symptoms and/or decreased quality of life following a traumatic event.

The purpose of this guideline is to identify pediatric trauma patients at high risk for post-trauma mental health adjustment disorder post-injury and facilitate brief interventions and appropriate referrals for longer term management and care.

1.      A HEADSS assessment will be performed on all admitted pediatric trauma patients age 11 years and older by the pediatric co-management team once the patient reaches floor status.

2.      Patients with a positive HEADSS assessment in the mental health categories AND/OR any pediatric patient experiencing the following traumatic events:

a.      Neglect and psychological, physical, or sexual abuse.

b.      Victim of community and school violence.

c.      Victim of gun-related violence (intentional self-inflicted GSW or suicidal attempt will prompt child psychiatry consult)

d.      Serious traumatic event causing life-threatening and devastating injuries (traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, loss of limb, mutilating/deforming injuries, etc)

e.      Prolonged hospital stay (longer than 1 week)

f.        Death of friend/family member in traumatic event

g.       Care provider discretion.


These patients are identified as high risk for post-injury mental health disorder(s) will undergo additional screening using the ASC6/ASC3 screening tool derived from the Acute Stress Checklist (ASC-Kids) or consultation with behavioral health/child psychiatry.


https://www.healthcaretoolbox.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/ASC-Kids%20English%20and%20Spanish%20with%20scoring%20info%20-%20all%20versions%20SAMPLE.pdf


3.      Patients admitted following self-inflicted injury or suicide attempt as well as patients with suicidal or homicidal ideation will receive inpatient consultation with child psychiatry.

4.      Patients who screen positive on the ASC6/ASC3 will receive one or more of the following intervention(s):

a.      Consultation of child psychiatry for inpatient assessment of mental health concerns 

b.      Referral to child psychiatry or psychology for outpatient assessment and management of mental health concerns

c.      Notification of primary pediatrician of mental health concerns for assistance in longer term follow-up and/or outpatient mental health referrals as indicated

5.      For patients who do not screen positive but have experienced one of the above traumatic events, the patient’s primary pediatrician should be notified with the recommendation to perform a repeat assessment of the patient’s mental health in 4-6 weeks time.

Documentation

The HEADDS, ASC6/ASC3 assessment (if performed), and interventions provided will be documented in a progress note by the pediatric co-management teams in the patient’s electronic medical record when consulted. For those patients remaining in the ICU for entire hospital course, mental health screening will be performed as indicated by the trauma service.

References:

1.      American College of Surgeons. (2022, December). Best Practices Guidelines: Screening and Intervention for mental health disorders and substance use and misuse. https://www.facs.org/media/nrcj31ku/mental-health-guidelines.pdf

2.      The Acute Stress Checklist (ASC-kids) (2016), https://www.healthcaretoolbox.org/acute-stress-checklist



Non-Surgical Service Admissions of Pediatric Trauma Patients at Nebraska Medicine

SCOPE AND PURPOSE

The document is applicable to pediatric patients (age <19) assessed and cared for at Nebraska Medicine.

POLICY AND PROCEDURE STATEMENTS

The pediatric trauma accreditation standards, as set forth by the American College of Surgeons, encourage all injured patients to be admitted to a surgical service. Children may be admitted to a pediatric general or subspecialty service when a medical diagnosis was initially made based on history and physical exam or for care of a pre-existing medical condition. In those rare instances, the following policy has been formulated to guide the management of an injured patient admitted to a non-surgical service.

  1. When it is known that a physical injury has occurred, a Trauma Surgery consult must be obtained. Assessment and recommendations for care will be documented in the electronic medical record.
  2. In conjunction with the admitting pediatrician, the trauma surgery attending will determine a plan of care that includes transfer to a surgical service when injury is the primary reason for admission. Concurrent care with pediatric critical care medicine (PCCM), pediatric co-management team or other pediatric specialists will continue during the child’s hospitalization. (See “Indications to consult Pediatric Critical Care Medicine for pediatric trauma patients” and “Indications to consult Pediatric Co-Management for pediatric trauma patients”)
  3. All patients who are found to have physical injuries must be evaluated for rehabilitative and social work needs.
  4. If suspicion of child abuse or neglect is identified, a referral to the Child Advocacy Team (CAT) and social work must occur promptly with subsequent additional work-up as indicated. (See “Evaluation and Management of Non-Accidental Trauma (NAT) in Children at Nebraska Medicine”)
  5. All non-surgical service admissions (NSA) of injured patients will be reviewed through the pediatric trauma performance improvement process.
      • NSA with trauma or other surgical consultations, with ISS≤9, or without other identified opportunities for improvement may be closed in primary review.
      • NSA without trauma or other surgical consultation, with ISS>9, or with identified opportunities for improvement must at a minimum be reviewed by the Pediatric Trauma Medical Director in secondary review.

 APPROVALS:

Authorized:

Emily Cantrell, MD

Pediatric Trauma Program Medical Director

Approved:

Lora Hofstetter, MSN, RN, CCRN, C-NPT

Pediatric Trauma Program Manager

DATE OF ORIGIN AND REVIEWS

Date of Origin: 8/2024

Date of Reviews:

CONTENT REVIEWERS AND CONTRIBUTORS

Pediatric Trauma Program Liaisons, Pediatrics

Pediatric Needle Cricothyroidotomy

Pediatric Needle Cricothyroidotomy 

Supplies

Process for Cannot Intubate and Cannot Ventilate (CICV) Emergency

Video available here: https://youtu.be/EEqXqiOyKr4?si=iF8VRp-n3FwuVeIB

  1. Identify landmarks and stabilize the larynx with non-dominant hand
  2. Access the cricothyroidotomy membrane with a 16G angiocath, aim in the caudad direction
  3. Connect syringe with saline and pull-back to confirm placement by air aspiration
  4. If placement is confirmed, connect macrobore tubing to catheter and then place 3.0 ETT end on tubing (See picture).
  5. Connect to a pressure limiting bag or a jet ventilation device
  6. Breaths should be delivered over 1 second and allowing for 2 second exhalation
  7. Observe for complications such as: subcutaneous emphysema, hemorrhage, hypoventilation, equipment failure, catheter kink, & false placement.

Additional Resources:

Please contact Dr. Emily Cantrell, Pediatric Trauma Medical Director, or Lora Hofstetter, Pediatric Trauma Program Coordinator for questions and additional training.

Pediatric Transport Contact Information

Critical Pediatric Trauma Patient Transfer Requests

Please be prepared with the following information:

If requesting transport to Children’s Nebraska:

·        Children’s Nebraska Transport                                                          855-850-5437

o   Ask for assistance in coordinating a transport to Children’s Nebraska for (state the need) i.e. Trauma, PICU, Orthopedics, Neurology, etc.

      If Children’s Nebraska Transport team is unavailable:

·        LifeNet or StarCare (AirMethods programs)                                    844-359-9111

o   Ask for assistance in coordinating transport of a patient to Children’s Nebraska

o   This will get you to an AirMethods Team that is closest.

If requesting transport of a patient to outside Omaha:

·        Children’s Nebraska Transport                                                            855-850-5437

o   Ask for assistance in coordinating transport of a patient from Nebraska Medicine to [Destination]

o   You will be connected to a team member to triage call.

·        Children’s Mercy                                                                                     800-466-3729

o   Ask for assistance in coordinating transport of a patient from Nebraska Medicine to [Destination]

o   Communication specialists will connect you to the appropriate physician or team to coordinate transport.

      If Specialized Pediatric Transport teams are unavailable:

·        LifeNet or StarCare (AirMethods)                                                       844-359-9111

o   Ask for assistance in coordinating transport of a patient from Nebraska Medicine to [Destination]

o   This will get you to an AirMethods Team that is closet with the appropriate asset.

Alternate Resource:

·        MercyOne (Sioux City, IA)                                                                     800-247-1911

o   Same process as LifeNet

**Air/Ground transport may be dependent on program regulations, weather, & team availability. For the safety of the team & patient, never pressure a team to change a decision based on decline for weather or comfort.

Contact Information for Pediatric Trauma Patients

Common Consults for Traumatic Injuries:

***In general, pediatric specialists will manage injuries in pediatric trauma patients <15 years of age with some variability between service lines and attendings. Pediatric surgery should be utilized for patients <15 years of age for general traumatic injuries. In patients 15 years and older, adult general surgery subspecialties (MIS, CRS, surgical oncology) may be consulted for second opinions/area expertise if needed but may defer consultation to pediatric surgery in certain circumstances (i.e. congenital issues, complex/prior pediatric surgery history, etc). Transplant/Hepatobiliary Surgery should be considered for the first call in the setting of emergent complex traumatic hepatobiliary injuries.***

***Pediatric attendings will be contacted by his/her respective resident. If there are questions or uncertainty involving the case, the trauma attending should reach out and discuss case with the on-call attending for that specific specialty***

***Decision to engage pediatric orthopedic specialists will be based on injury, skeletal maturity and discretion of orthopedic attending on call. If orthopedic injury is isolated and transfer to Children’s hospital for management is requested, the trauma attending should be notified and agree to transfer. The pediatric TMD should also be notified of the plan to transfer a patient***

General Pediatric and Pediatric Subspecialties:

*****If there is difficulty in contacting specific pediatric subspecialties or find that any of these numbers are incorrect/out of date, please contact Dr. Emily Cantrell (pediatric TMD) of Lora Hofstetter (pediatric trauma program coordinator) for additional assistance*****

Last updated: March, 2025


Recommendations for Acute Pain Treatment and Procedural Pain and Sedation Management for Pediatric Patients


Common medical procedures used to assess and treat children can cause significant pain and distress. Before initiating any non-emergent procedure in pediatric trauma patients, please take a moment to try and optimize pain and sedation management. Below are two links with recommendations and suggestions on how to approach pain and sedation management in pediatric patients before procedures. Of note, NM does not have all of the recommended drugs/products available on formulary. Please discuss with pharmacy if there are any questions regarding drug choice and dosage prior to use.  

  1. Pediatric Education and Advocacy (PEAK): Bottom Line Recommendations: Pain Treatment
  2. Pediatric Education and Advocacy Kit (PEAK): Bottom Line Recommendations: Procedural Pain
  3. Pediatric Education and Advocacy Kit (PEAK): Bottom Line Recommendations: Procedural Sedation


Date Created: March, 2025

Pediatric Presence at Pediatric Trauma Activations

Purpose:

The trauma service frequently encounters critically injured pediatric patients that require pediatric specific resuscitation measures. To optimize patient outcomes and experiences, assistance in the initial resuscitation and care of these critically injured pediatric trauma patients is often enhanced by the presence and involvement of pediatric nursing and/or pediatric critical care provider. The following guidelines outline when pediatric nursing and providers will be present at pediatric trauma activations.

Criteria for Pediatric Presence at Pediatric Trauma Activations:

***Due to staffing and responsibilities in the pediatric ICU, the pediatric critical care provider and pediatric ICU lead nurse (or designee) may not always be immediately available to respond in person to activations. If the pediatric critical care provider and/or nurse are not present at a pediatric trauma activation and presence is needed, please contact at above listed numbers.***

Responsibilities:

Responsibilities and involvement of pediatric nursing and pediatric critical care provider during the initial trauma resuscitation will be in collaboration with the trauma team and at the discretion of the trauma attending. Responsibilities include, but are not limited to, the following:

Transferring Pediatric Trauma Patients to Children's Nebraska Emergency Department

Process for Transferring Pediatric Trauma Patients to Children’s Nebraska Emergency Department

As a level II pediatric trauma center, every effort should be made to care for pediatric trauma patients at Nebraska Medicine (NM). However, based on allocation of resources and specialty services, certain pediatric traumatic injuries may benefit from transfer to Children’s Nebraska. In general, these injuries include but are not limited to the following:

Patients with multiple injuries, particularly those requiring active monitoring for risk of hemodynamic decompensation or need for rapid intervention, should stay at NM and be primarily admitted and managed by the trauma service with appropriate consulting services as indicated by injury/clinical status.

If transfer to Children’s Nebraska is deemed necessary, the following steps should be taken:

image.png